This is the mail archive of the gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: problem porting my application to new gcc (non-const reference )


On 30 March 2011 11:30, Mahmood Naderan wrote:
> I rewrte the neccessary funtion definitions again to be clear:

...
> static API::conf_object_t * constructor(API::parse_object_t * aParseObject) {

OK, this is a static function, that's what I was asking.

> ? template <class CppObjectClass >
> ? class Factory {
> ??? typedef Class<CppObjectClass> class_;
> ??? class_ * theClass;
> ???? public:
> ??? Factory() {
> ????? static class_ theStaticClass;
> ????? theClass = &theStaticClass;
> ??? }
> ??? typename class_::object_type create(std::string aSimName) {
> ????? API::conf_object_t * object = aux_::NewObject_stub(
> ??????? const_cast<API::conf_class_t *>( theClass->getSimClass() ), aSimName,
> theClass->constructor);

What if you change theClass->constructor to &class_::constructor instead?


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]