This is the mail archive of the gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Confusing optimization

From: "Luca Béla Palkovics" <luca dot bela dot palkovics at gmail dot com>
To: Ian Lance Taylor <iant at google dot com>
Cc: gcc-help at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Wed, 12 May 2010 16:24:05 +0200
Subject: Re: Confusing optimization
References: <1273433133.6007.24.camel@luca-laptop> <mcr4oigpdi7.fsf@dhcp-172-17-9-151.mtv.corp.google.com> <1273501665.1769.48.camel@luca-laptop> <mcrr5ljogk4.fsf@dhcp-172-17-9-151.mtv.corp.google.com>

Am Montag, den 10.05.2010, 09:41 -0700 schrieb Ian Lance Taylor:
> If you are interested in how much CPU time the functions require,
> using the clock function will be more accurate.  However, clock can be
> misleading if the functions make any system calls.
Okay, I will checkout the clock function.
I have rewritten a lot of my code and the problem disappeared.

Thanks alot for the help/information.

Luca.

References:
- Confusing optimization
  - From: Luca Béla Palkovics
- Re: Confusing optimization
  - From: Ian Lance Taylor
- Re: Re: Confusing optimization
  - From: Luca Béla Palkovics
- Re: Confusing optimization
  - From: Ian Lance Taylor

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]