This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: surprising precision
On Fri, 2010-03-05 at 11:57 -0500, John S. Fine wrote:
> Steve Teale wrote:
> > Congratulations on a helpful answer.
> Thanks for the compliment. Despite my knowing much less about GCC than
> the experts who usually answer here, I think I sometimes have a better
> insight into what is confusing the OP. Then I try to provide a helpful
> answer. I think I did that this time.
> > Yours was the first one that did
> > not display the almost conventional GCC guru arrogance.
> But I have to disagree with you there. The GCC gurus typically
> answering in this mailing list, including in this thread, do a great
> job. I'm very impressed with the accuracy and helpfulness of answers in
> this mailing list. I usually learn something.
> I didn't initially answer your post, because I didn't want to dilute the
> discussion about precision with a lot of meta discussion about GCC
> gurus. But now that it is already diluted by other replies, I didn't
> want to leave the impression that I agree with you about that
> "arrogance" of the GCC gurus.
OK, so I overstated it, but the remark got some attention, and I do
believe there is substance behind it. It's probably just a cultural