This is the mail archive of the gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: with -std=c++0x typeof is gone

From: me22 <me22 dot ca at gmail dot com>
To: phorgan1 at yahoo dot com
Cc: GCC-help <gcc-help at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2010 21:08:05 -0500
Subject: Re: with -std=c++0x typeof is gone
References: <4B612F3E.5040409@yahoo.com> <fa28b9251001272253r1955a2e7h99b0f9f60f43f334@mail.gmail.com> <4B614E12.9070902@yahoo.com> <fa28b9251001281406q1e930446ia43e4f320db9db4b@mail.gmail.com> <4B620CAB.40407@yahoo.com> <fa28b9251001281422h492b8f73gfe448cfd32361755@mail.gmail.com> <4B621082.6060905@yahoo.com>

2010/1/28 Patrick Horgan <phorgan1@yahoo.com>:
>
> But that assumes that operator- returns the same type (possibly signed) as
> its arguments.Â How could you know that?Â The declspec(T()-T()) would take
> the return type of the (possible) operator-, no?
>

You're right; I am assuming that.

I don't know your situation.  I do wonder whether even the declspec
solution would be sufficient if T used expression templates or other
such techniques, though.

~ Scott

References:
- with -std=c++0x typeof is gone
  - From: Patrick Horgan
- Re: with -std=c++0x typeof is gone
  - From: me22
- Re: with -std=c++0x typeof is gone
  - From: Patrick Horgan
- Re: with -std=c++0x typeof is gone
  - From: me22
- Re: with -std=c++0x typeof is gone
  - From: me22

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]