This is the mail archive of the gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Disabling call graph optimizations

From: Diego Novillo <dnovillo at google dot com>
To: Sunzir Deepur <sunzird at gmail dot com>
Cc: JTXX <jtxx000 at yahoo dot co dot uk>, gcc-help at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Thu, 02 Aug 2007 07:56:20 -0400
Subject: Re: Disabling call graph optimizations
References: <584426.19436.qm@web25414.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> <46B0C0D5.1040502@google.com> <b758af9e0708012213r6a7d85cbuf1f86979c438e5ae@mail.gmail.com>

On 8/2/07 1:13 AM, Sunzir Deepur wrote:

> I'm only interested in code, not data. Is it possible that they will not
> be complete with respect to code/procedures ?

All the functions that are considered reachable are going to be in the
dumps (so, static functions that are never called and are reclaimed
early, will not be in the dump).  What we typically leave out are type
declarations, and the dumps are only a C-like representation,
essentially a pretty-printed version of the internal language.

References:
- Disabling call graph optimizations
  - From: JTXX
- Re: Disabling call graph optimizations
  - From: Diego Novillo
- Re: Disabling call graph optimizations
  - From: Sunzir Deepur

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]