Re: static declaration of foo follows non-static declaration

[Aseem Rastogi <aseem at india dot tejasnetworks dot com>]

In that case, have you made sure that foo is declared before it is used ?

And can you attach some code snippe.

-Aseem.

Dhiraj.Nilange@iflexsolutions.com wrote:

> Hi Aseem,
>
> This is a pure 'C' code. So it doesn't have any class. Here foo is one
> global function.
>
> Basically this is a typical C file where many functions are 
> defined (foo is used by some other functions in the same C file). Being
> outside any scope they are global. There is no main function defined.
>
>
> Thanks,
> -Dhiraj
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: gcc-help-owner@gcc.gnu.org [mailto:gcc-help-owner@gcc.gnu.org] On
> Behalf Of Aseem Rastogi
> Sent: Monday, June 11, 2007 4:49 PM
> To: Dhiraj Nilange-DD
> Cc: gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org
> Subject: Re: static declaration of foo follows non-static declaration
>
> I doubt the way you are using foo () in your code. I hope you are aware 
> that static functions should be used by prefixing them with class name. 
> For ex. if class name is A and function is foo, you should write A::foo
> ().
>
> If you can show some code, it would be better.
>
> -Aseem.
>
> Dhiraj.Nilange@iflexsolutions.com wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > During gcc compilation of  C code I am getting these strange errors
> > (compile time):-
> >
> >
> > error: static declaration of foo follows non-static declaration
> >
> > error: previous implicit declaration of foo was here
> >
> >
> > foo is some function here. These errors are surprising, because there
> is
>
> > only one definition of the function foo. Moreover this code perflectly
> > gets compiled using IBM's xlr_c and HP's aCC. So I guess this is gcc
> > specific issue. Please help!
> >
> > Thanks,
> > -Dhiraj