This is the mail archive of the gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: -Wl vs -W1

From: Andrew <andrew at ugh dot net dot au>
To: Ian Lance Taylor <iant at google dot com>
Cc: gcc-help at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2006 12:11:22 +1000 (EST)
Subject: Re: -Wl vs -W1
References: <20060902072307.P85023@starbug.ugh.net.au> <m3fyf6ibqn.fsf@localhost.localdomain>

On Wed, 5 Sep 2006, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:

Are you sure you are asking about gcc?  To my knowledge gcc does not
support with a -Wl or a -W1 option.  This is what I see when I try it:

I think you must provide a comma (so the full option is probably technically -1, and -l,. The man page lists "-Wl,option". It passes arguments through to the linker by some means (I'm using it with -W1,-soname,libfoo.so.1).

Thanks,

Andrew

Follow-Ups:
- Re: -Wl vs -W1
  - From: Ian Lance Taylor

References:
- -Wl vs -W1
  - From: Andrew
- Re: -Wl vs -W1
  - From: Ian Lance Taylor

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]