This is the mail archive of the gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

RE: Modifying the LABEL for functions emitted by the GCC Compiler

From: "John \(Eljay\) Love-Jensen" <eljay at adobe dot com>
To: "Rohit Arul Raj" <rohitarulraj at gmail dot com>
Cc: <gcc-help at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2006 07:18:00 -0700
Subject: RE: Modifying the LABEL for functions emitted by the GCC Compiler
References: <c356fd4e0609010631v55712f0bu858c3b7d10914673@mail.gmail.com> <c356fd4e0609010706m3c45e42cp1ca9230db05990b4@mail.gmail.com>

Hi Rohit,

Note:  your question is somewhat off topic to this forum.  It's not really a GCC question, per se.

If your platform has the convention of leading underscore on C routines, you should have everything compiled with that convention.

Trying to mix with and without leading underscore conventions will be an exercise in frustration and futility.

If you have a library compiled one way, and other code compiled the other way, and you just REALLY have to get them to talk (and you have a lot of time and patience), you could write some springboard stub routines.

But I first strongly recommend just insuring everything is compiled with the same leading underscore convention.

HTH,
--Eljay

PS:  please don't cross post to both the gcc and gcc-help forums.

References:
- Modifying the LABEL for functions emitted by the GCC Compiler
  - From: Rohit Arul Raj
- Re: Modifying the LABEL for functions emitted by the GCC Compiler
  - From: Rohit Arul Raj

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]