This is the mail archive of the gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: efficiency


Bob Rossi writes:
 > On Thu, Mar 16, 2006 at 05:58:29PM -0800, Brian Budge wrote:
 > > Hi -
 > > 
 > > This is not really a gcc question, and it should really be asked
 > > elsewhere... however, it's unlikely that this occasional dereference
 > > will adversely affect performance.
 > 
 > OK, where should a question like this be asked? if not the compiler that
 > does the optimization?

I agree with you, Bob -- it's a perfectly reasonable question.

 > I forgot to mention, I only really care about the efficiency
 > regarding gcc's output.

Well, if you really want to know, use "gcc -S".

Access to a local is something like

        movl    8(%ebp), %eax

and to a global via a pointer

        movl    sfoo, %eax
        movl    4(%eax), %eax
 
Andrew.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]