This is the mail archive of the gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: GCC 4 + PCH + no inline template functions => undefined symbol! ?

From: "Sébastien L." <sleon at pointcarre dot com>
To: gcc-help at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Fri, 01 Jul 2005 13:28:19 +0200
Subject: Re: GCC 4 + PCH + no inline template functions => undefined symbol! ?
References: <42C51BBB.9060802@pointcarre.com> <6.2.1.2.2.20050701061242.0266e040@iplan-mn.corp.adobe.com>

Hello Eljay,

Thank you again for your help :-) Last time I solved my problem (1.3 Go binary debug on Mac OS X) in using a newer version of binutils, shipped with Tiger. It was an "Apple customised" binutils bug.

>Do you get the undefined symbols when you do
>not use pre-compiled headers with GCC 4.0?

I hadn't check this because if I disable the pch, I have to modify ~2300 files. And this is a no option too because compilation time will be ~ 4 times longer (I would stick on gcc 3.3 or 3.4 rather). But you right : this would be a good test. :-(

Sébastien

Follow-Ups:
- Re: GCC 4 + PCH + no inline template functions => undefined symbol ! ?
  - From: Eljay Love-Jensen

References:
- GCC 4 + PCH + no inline template functions => undefined symbol !?
  - From: "Sébastien L."
- Re: GCC 4 + PCH + no inline template functions => undefined symbol ! ?
  - From: Eljay Love-Jensen

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]