This is the mail archive of the gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: whats wrong with pointer to member function

From: Matthias Oltmanns <Mathias dot Oltmanns dot Oltmanns at sysde dot eads dot net>
To: Momchil Velikov <velco at fadata dot bg>
Cc: gcc-help at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: 07 May 2003 11:41:35 +0200
Subject: Re: whats wrong with pointer to member function
References: <653138C25D8AD6118292000347080A37770363@zin05exm02.corp.mot.com> <878ytjxi5o.fsf@freon.briz.fadata.bg>

Am Mit, 2003-05-07 um 10.41 schrieb Momchil Velikov:
> >>>>> "Bhattiprolu" == Bhattiprolu Ravikumar-A18658 <ravikb@motorola.com> writes:
> 
>     Bhattiprolu> Hi Matthias,
>     Bhattiprolu>    To my knowledge, in C++ to use function pointer to a member function, 
>     Bhattiprolu> the member function has to be static member function. Try making foo as static.
> 
> No.
> 
> It's a simple operatoir precedence problem, instead of
> ``pA->*member();'' write ``(pA->*member)();'', likewise instead of
> ``a.*member();'' write ``(a.*member)()''.
> 
That's the point. Thank you!

Matthias

> ~velco
-- 
Matthias Oltmanns

Tel: 04421-1543-274
mail: Mathias.Oltmanns.Oltmanns@sysde.eads.net

References:
- RE: whats wrong with pointer to member function
  - From: Bhattiprolu Ravikumar-A18658
- Re: whats wrong with pointer to member function
  - From: Momchil Velikov

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]