This is the mail archive of the
gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Anyone manage to build gcc/g++ 2.95[.1] on HP-UX 10.20 hppa1.1?
- To: Graham W Hudspith <geordie at lucent dot com>
- Subject: Re: Anyone manage to build gcc/g++ 2.95[.1] on HP-UX 10.20 hppa1.1?
- From: Jeffrey A Law <law at cygnus dot com>
- Date: Fri, 27 Aug 1999 15:49:39 -0600
- cc: gcc-help at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Reply-To: law at cygnus dot com
In message <37C69587.9447D627@lucent.com>you write:
> This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
> --------------277AB62406A70F0F14B37E46
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>
> I have successfully built many releases of egcs on HP-UX 10.20 running on a
> n
> hppa1.1 in the past, but I have been completely UNsuccessful w.r.t. gcc/g++
> 2.95[.1] (using gas v2.9.1).
>
> I HAVE managed to build gcc/g++ 2.95[.1] on HP-UX 10.20 running on an hppa2
> .0
> (using gas Cygnus-snapshot 990823) AND on HP-UX 11.00 running on an hppa1.1
> (using gas v2.9.1).
>
> However, when I try on HP-UX 10.20 running on an hppa1.1 (using gas v2.9.1
> OR
> Cygnus-snapshot 990823), the "gmake compare" fails with LOTS of .o files.
I don't see how that could be happening since the compiler does not change its
code generation strategy unless you explicitly ask for it.
ie, it will generate the same code for hppa1.1 as it does for hppa2.0.
The only thing I can think of is that the compiler you're using on your PA1.1
hpux10.20 box is somehow mis-compiling gcc.
My recommendation is to find the smallest .o file that is different, then find
out why it is different. ie, is the code in the .text section different? Or
is it something in one of the debug sections, or in a header, etc etc.
jeff