This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug fortran/68289] Missing diagnostic pragmas
- From: "egallager at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2018 04:47:37 +0000
- Subject: [Bug fortran/68289] Missing diagnostic pragmas
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
- References: <bug-68289-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68289
Eric Gallager <egallager at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keywords| |diagnostic
Status|WAITING |SUSPENDED
CC| |egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
See Also| |https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
| |a/show_bug.cgi?id=44054,
| |https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
| |a/show_bug.cgi?id=64273
--- Comment #6 from Eric Gallager <egallager at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #1)
> IMO implementing the diagnostic pragmas in gfortran will just be a waste of
> time. Thus if someone want to close this PR as WONTFIX, I won't object!
That sounds more like material for putting it in SUSPENDED; WONTFIX is more for
a fundamental disagreement with it rather than just lack of interest, and
WAITING is for when the reporter needs to provide more info.