This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug middle-end/81657] [8 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/20050503-1.c scan-assembler-not call
- From: "wilco at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2018 19:18:30 +0000
- Subject: [Bug middle-end/81657] [8 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/20050503-1.c scan-assembler-not call
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
- References: <bug-81657-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81657
--- Comment #9 from Wilco <wilco at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #8)
> That just means r240568 caused another regression.
> Again, on various targets strchr is efficient, just on a few ones it is not
> and the change was unfortunately done generically.
On practically all targets, including x64, strchr is not as efficient as
strlen.