This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug target/83740] [8 Regression] ICE in maybe_legitimize_operand, at optabs.c:7140
- From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2018 21:47:52 +0000
- Subject: [Bug target/83740] [8 Regression] ICE in maybe_legitimize_operand, at optabs.c:7140
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
- References: <bug-83740-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83740
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed| |2018-01-09
CC| |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
I certainly can't reproduce ICE in the middle-end/backend, but can reproduce
starting with r256284 following ICE:
internal compiler error: in gfc_add_modify_loc, at fortran/trans.c:159
0x8fb176 gfc_add_modify_loc(unsigned int, stmtblock_t*, tree_node*, tree_node*)
../../gcc/fortran/trans.c:158
0x8fb1e3 gfc_add_modify(stmtblock_t*, tree_node*, tree_node*)
../../gcc/fortran/trans.c:170
0x9067d9 gfc_trans_array_ctor_element
../../gcc/fortran/trans-array.c:1565
0x9071af gfc_trans_array_constructor_value
../../gcc/fortran/trans-array.c:1781
0x90917f trans_array_constructor
../../gcc/fortran/trans-array.c:2541
0x909b30 gfc_add_loop_ss_code
../../gcc/fortran/trans-array.c:2817
0x9107a1 gfc_conv_loop_setup(gfc_loopinfo*, locus*)
../../gcc/fortran/trans-array.c:5109
0x991a08 gfc_trans_transfer(gfc_code*)
../../gcc/fortran/trans-io.c:2657
0x901372 trans_code
../../gcc/fortran/trans.c:2028
0x9014db gfc_trans_code_cond(gfc_code*, tree_node*)
../../gcc/fortran/trans.c:2131
0x990030 build_dt
../../gcc/fortran/trans-io.c:2028
0x99010b gfc_trans_write(gfc_code*)
../../gcc/fortran/trans-io.c:2067
0x9012e8 trans_code
../../gcc/fortran/trans.c:2000