This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug fortran/83705] [8 Regression] ICE/wrong code with large values of REPEAT after revision r256284
- From: "jb at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Sat, 06 Jan 2018 11:15:45 +0000
- Subject: [Bug fortran/83705] [8 Regression] ICE/wrong code with large values of REPEAT after revision r256284
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
- References: <bug-83705-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83705
--- Comment #1 from Janne Blomqvist <jb at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
> which makes sense for variables, but IMO not for parameters.
I agree, that's why a few lines before that block checking the size limit we
have:
/* For further simplification, we need the character string to be
constant. */
if (e->expr_type != EXPR_CONSTANT)
return NULL;