This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug ada/82141] [8 Regression] raised RTSFIND.RE_NOT_AVAILABLE : rtsfind.adb:851 on darwin
- From: "ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2017 18:27:28 +0000
- Subject: [Bug ada/82141] [8 Regression] raised RTSFIND.RE_NOT_AVAILABLE : rtsfind.adb:851 on darwin
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
- References: <bug-82141-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82141
--- Comment #25 from Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
> AFAIR, the difference is that the Ada runtime (when built during each stage)
> is made as convenience (statically linked) libs, whereas libada is built
> shared - so there will (probably) be different code-gen paths. ("Probably"
> is only stated because x86-64 Darwin should always build PIC code for m64 so
> if it was doing something different that would, indeed be an accident)
No, as Arno said, there is no difference w or w/o --disable-libada.