This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug libstdc++/71660] [5/6/7/8 regression] alignment of std::atomic<8 byte primitive type> (long long, double) is wrong on x86
- From: "chgans at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Sat, 02 Sep 2017 06:56:41 +0000
- Subject: [Bug libstdc++/71660] [5/6/7/8 regression] alignment of std::atomic<8 byte primitive type> (long long, double) is wrong on x86
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
- References: <bug-71660-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71660
Christian Gagneraud <chgans at gmail dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |chgans at gmail dot com
--- Comment #6 from Christian Gagneraud <chgans at gmail dot com> ---
Hi there,
What is the status of this bug report? Will this be fixed one day? Isn't this a
serious issue?
Qt cannot currently be fully built because of this. See
http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/interest/2017-September/027953.html
http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/interest/2017-September/027955.html
Honestly this all look scary to me, either gcc behaviour or Qt beahaviour or
both.
Full thread on Qt ML:
http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/interest/2017-September/027948.html