This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug c++/81928] if(!this) optimization leads to possible errors without warnings


https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81928

Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|WAITING                     |RESOLVED
         Resolution|---                         |INVALID

--- Comment #9 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Matthieu Brucher from comment #8)
> What is fundamentally wrong is stated in the standard. It is an undefined
> behavior to call a method from a null pointer. So testing this inside a
> method is an undefined behavior

Nonsense.

It can never be null, but it's not undefined to check that. It's 100% defined
that this==nullptr is always false.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]