This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug ipa/81465] [8 Regression] ICE in estimate_edge_growth at gcc/ipa-inline.h:85 on s390x target
- From: "hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2017 13:23:19 +0000
- Subject: [Bug ipa/81465] [8 Regression] ICE in estimate_edge_growth at gcc/ipa-inline.h:85 on s390x target
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
- References: <bug-81465-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81465
Jan Hubicka <hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4 from Jan Hubicka <hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
OK, so now the tests passes when inline clone is either in no comdat group list
(even if function inlined to is in one) or if the comdat groups are the same.
Does it fail when we test that comdats groups are always the same? It seems
iffy to allow silently both. I guess both variants are fine, but lets pick one
of them. Perhaps we want only to remove node from comdat group list while
inlining it.
Honza