This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug c++/80648] [DR903] Valid C++11 null pointer constant (1-1) is rejected


https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80648

Jason Merrill <jason at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |jason at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #10 from Jason Merrill <jason at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The committee has recently started indicating explicitly whether a particular
DR is intended to apply to the existing standard or only to the next one; most
fall into the former category.  We weren't doing that at the time of DR 903,
but it clearly is intended to resolve an issue introduced in C++11 with
constexpr, so I think it clearly should apply.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]