This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug fortran/79430] [7 Regression] action of statement incorrectly optimised away
- From: "juergen.reuter at desy dot de" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2017 11:48:22 +0000
- Subject: [Bug fortran/79430] [7 Regression] action of statement incorrectly optimised away
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
- References: <bug-79430-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79430
--- Comment #56 from Jürgen Reuter <juergen.reuter at desy dot de> ---
(In reply to Thomas Koenig from comment #55)
> (In reply to Jürgen Reuter from comment #52)
> > I tried again to make a more reduced test case, but I couldn't really
> > separate it from library structure of our code. Do you think you can work
> > with the given test case?
>
> What I can (personally) do is to try and find the offending
> revision by bisection. It should then be doable (hopefully by somebody
> else) to find any differences due to that particular revision
> by examining differences in tree and RTL dumps.
>
> This will take some time, though.
Sure, take your time. As we have a workaround there is no panic on our side. In
any case, the problem only appeared for using fp-80 as kind parameters for
floats which is not the default application.