This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug c++/78734] [C++17] P0145R3: function arguments are indeterminately sequenced


https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78734

Marek Polacek <mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #1 from Marek Polacek <mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
I'm not sure it's wrong.  In
<https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-07/msg00348.html> Jason says

In other news, I convinced the committee to drop function arguments
from the order of evaluation paper, so we don't have to worry about
that hit on PUSH_ARGS_REVERSED targets.

Also, looking at op_is_ordered, I see nothing re CALL_EXPRs.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]