This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug c++/80059] [7 Regression] ICE with invalid noexcept for __transaction_atomic


https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80059

Marek Polacek <mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
           Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org      |mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #5 from Marek Polacek <mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Yeah, seems fine to me.  Although I don't think we need to check
processing_template_decl before fold_non_dependent_expr.

I'll test and post, thanks.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]