This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug inline-asm/79880] Gcc refuses to encode vpgatherdd instruction (x86-64)


https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79880

--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Perhaps something to report to llvm that they accept invalid, that is a bug.
Also, why do you use Intel syntax when you don't know how should it be used? 
In AT&T syntax you wouldn't need to specify this extra stuff, just vpgatherdd
%xmm4, (%r13 + %xmm3), %xmm4.  Also note that for inline asm you don't specify
clobbers etc. (but that might be just from simplification of the testcase).

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]