This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug c/79358] gcc.dg/c99-stdint-1.c fails with excess error


https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79358

--- Comment #6 from Dominik Vogt <vogt at linux dot vnet.ibm.com> ---
(In reply to Andreas Krebbel from comment #2)
> The reduced testcase fails with -m31 and -m64 but the original probably only
> with -m31 - right?!

Sorry, you're right.  I was doing too many things in parallel.
Another attempt at reduction:

--
#include <limits.h> 
#include <stdint.h> 
#define CHECK_UNSIGNED(TYPE) \ 
  do { TYPE a; int b[(TYPE)-1 < 0 ? -1 : 1]; } while (0) 
#define CHECK_EXPR_TYPE(TYPE, EXPR) \ 
  do { __typeof__(EXPR) a; __typeof__((TYPE)0 + 0) *b = &a; } while (0) 
#define UNSIGNED_MAX_COND(TYPE, EXPR) \ 
  ((EXPR) == (TYPE)-1) 
#define CHECK_UNSIGNED_LIMITS_2(TYPE, MAX, MAXBD)               \ 
  CHECK_UNSIGNED(TYPE);                                         \ 
  CHECK_EXPR_TYPE(TYPE, (MAX));                                 \ 
  do { int a[(UNSIGNED_MAX_COND(TYPE, (MAX))                    \ 
              && (MAX) >= (MAXBD)) ? 1 : -1]; } while (0) 

void 
test_misc_limits (void) 
{ 
  CHECK_UNSIGNED_LIMITS_2(__SIZE_TYPE__, SIZE_MAX, 65535U); 
} 
--

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]