This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug fortran/79305] real128 - undefined reference to cexpl
- From: "sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2017 18:29:02 +0000
- Subject: [Bug fortran/79305] real128 - undefined reference to cexpl
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
- References: <bug-79305-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79305
--- Comment #3 from Steve Kargl <sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu> ---
On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 06:00:43PM +0000, kargl at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
>
> The above will clearly never be built. In fact, a causal perusal
> of c99_protos.h shows that none of the fallback functions in
> c99_functions.c are built.
>
Ugh. I retract this part of the analysis. c99_protos.h is
not used within c99_functions.c. The issue is an incorrect
spelling of HAVE_EXPL as EXPL.