This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug target/78478] Compile Error for i386-rtems


https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78478

Uroš Bizjak <ubizjak at gmail dot com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |hjl.tools at gmail dot com

--- Comment #11 from Uroš Bizjak <ubizjak at gmail dot com> ---
(In reply to Joel Sherrill from comment #9)

> I could pursue this but is soft-float on the x86 target really worth the
> investment of any effort? AFAIK we would be looking at a very old CPU at
> this point. 
> 
> I only see soft-float listed as a multilib in t-rtems. 
> 
> Is there any reason to keep it? :)

Intel MCU probably trips at the same place. CC added.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]