This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug target/78660] [7 Regression] 7.0 bootstrap fail on mips64el-unknow-linux: configure-stage2-target-libgcc' failed
- From: "ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2017 10:04:39 +0000
- Subject: [Bug target/78660] [7 Regression] 7.0 bootstrap fail on mips64el-unknow-linux: configure-stage2-target-libgcc' failed
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
- References: <bug-78660-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78660
--- Comment #12 from Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
> Maybe the load sign-extends instead of zero-extending as specified initially.
But I'm not sure that this matters here, since:
(insn 58 57 59 3 (set (subreg:SI (reg:DI 316 [ iftmp.3_114 ]) 0)
(ne:SI (reg/f:DI 469 [ current_scope.1_1->bindings ])
(const_int 0 [0])))
"/althome/mips/v6/src/gcc/gcc/c/c-decl.me.c":915 501 {*sne_zero_disi}
(expr_list:REG_DEAD (reg/f:DI 469 [ current_scope.1_1->bindings ])
(nil)))
can put only 0 or 1 in the SUBREG, can't it?