This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug other/78971] ggc-min-expand default value is probably obsolete


https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78971

--- Comment #2 from Aurelien Jarno <aurelien at aurel32 dot net> ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> Actually it would be better if we reduce the need to allocate as much memory.
> 
> >In 2017 it's quite common to have a machine with 1GB of RAM.
> 
> Actually is is quite common to have a machine with more than 32G of memory
> especially servers.

Yes, exactly my point. It means the heuristic now almost always uses the same
value, that is 100%.


> But really ggc-min-expand is not the problem rather the amount of GC memory
> being allocated.

Ok. I'll do that.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]