This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug other/78839] DWARF output different between GCC 5 and 6


https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78839

--- Comment #6 from Tom O'Connor <toconnor at forcepoint dot com> ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #5)
> (In reply to Tom O'Connor from comment #4)
> > Bitfields seemed to work fine in all GCC prior to 6, FWIW.  The same
> > attached source code when built with other GCCs prior to 6 generates
> > DW_AT_data_member_location = 0 for all the fields as expected.  Only 6 gets
> > some of the fields "wrong".
> 
> Maybe I am thinking big-endian :).

Ah, I've only observed this on little-endian, as that's the only place I've
looked.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]