This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug target/78509] [7 regression] ICE in in excess_precision_type, at tree.c:8875


https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78509

--- Comment #13 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
I don't have a box with 3dnow, but the assembly for -m32 -O2 -m3dnow -mno-sse
pr42549.c looks identical on x86_64-linux between gcc 6 and trunk.
So, what exact options (implicit or explicit) you are using, what differences
in assembly do you see on this test compared to 6.x and does it fail there too?

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]