This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug target/78509] [7 regression] ICE in in excess_precision_type, at tree.c:8875
- From: "jgreenhalgh at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2016 10:54:23 +0000
- Subject: [Bug target/78509] [7 regression] ICE in in excess_precision_type, at tree.c:8875
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
- References: <bug-78509-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78509
--- Comment #12 from James Greenhalgh <jgreenhalgh at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
I tried looking at the generated assembly for that test with the compilers I
built before my patch series, and after the patch series + the fix above. I
couldn't see any difference in code generated for the testcase you mention for
each of the sets of options Jakub gave above (with -m3dnow, -O2, -m32 for the
testcase).
If this turns out to be my fault, I'll gladly look in to it - but I'll need
help getting the x86 flags right again!