This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug rtl-optimization/78120] [6/7 Regression] If conversion no longer performed


https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78120

James Greenhalgh <jgreenhalgh at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #5 from James Greenhalgh <jgreenhalgh at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
If this is a 6 regression it may be more likely related to Kyrill's work on
if-converting arithmetic instructions ( r227368 and follow-ups) than my cost
work (which only landed for GCC 7) - though I'm sure my cost work won't have
helped as the impact of my changes would likely cause less if-conversion for
x86, which reports branches as cheap and conditional moves as expensive.

My ifcvt work for GCC 6 was more related to multiple sets in a basic block,
which I don't think this testcase requires.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]