This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug middle-end/77964] [7 Regression] Linux kernel firmware loader miscompiled
- From: "jirislaby at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2016 13:54:50 +0000
- Subject: [Bug middle-end/77964] [7 Regression] Linux kernel firmware loader miscompiled
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
- References: <bug-77964-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77964
--- Comment #16 from Jiri Slaby <jirislaby at gmail dot com> ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #15)
> lots of them that rely on pointer arithmetics being defined only within the
> same object.
Sure, but the two pointers (taken implicitly of the arrays) are within the
same object. So I do not see, why it wouldn't work? I.e. where exactly this
breaks the C specs?