This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug target/77676] powerpc64 and powerpc64le stage2 bootstrap fail


https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77676

Martin Sebor <msebor at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
           Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org      |msebor at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #7 from Martin Sebor <msebor at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The optimization is meant to be independent of the warning.  If it isn't it's a
bug in the code.

I successfully tested the pass on powerpc64le just last week, but I did not
test it on any ILP32 targets.  Let me look into this.

In the meantime, the optimization can be disabled by initializing the
-fprintf-return-value option to 0, without disabling anything else.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]