This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug target/62180] (RX600) - compiler doesn't honor -fstrict-volatile-bitfields and generates incorrect machine code for I/O register access


https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62180

Oleg Endo <olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #6 from Oleg Endo <olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to DJ Delorie from comment #4)
> Perhaps you need this patch:
> 
> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-06/msg00993.html

DJ, did you actually commit that patch?

In any case, I think this issue can be closed.  Using bitfields for hardware
access is not really a safe thing to do.  E.g. see also PR 67644.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]