This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug c/72794] [7 regression] CF on spec2000/176.gcc after r238862.


https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72794

--- Comment #4 from Yuri Rumyantsev <ysrumyan at gmail dot com> ---
I assume that there is still issue in lto part of compiler - even if
we ignore "inline" attribute we (lto) must not delete such functions
from binaries. So this bug must be forwarded to lto phase.

2016-08-03 19:43 GMT+03:00 pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
<gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72794
>
> Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
>
>            What    |Removed                     |Added
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>              Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |RESOLVED
>          Resolution|---                         |INVALID
>
> --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
> (In reply to Yuri Rumyantsev from comment #2)
>> Yes, this option cures CF. Does it mean that we must compile spec2000
>> with this flag?
>
> Yes and it should be considered a portability flag.
>
> Basically GNU90 and ISO C99 inline behave slightly different which is why you
> are seeing this.
>
> --
> You are receiving this mail because:
> You reported the bug.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]