This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug target/71097] New: Additional testsuite failures with -mcmodel=medium
- From: "ro at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Fri, 13 May 2016 08:31:43 +0000
- Subject: [Bug target/71097] New: Additional testsuite failures with -mcmodel=medium
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71097
Bug ID: 71097
Summary: Additional testsuite failures with -mcmodel=medium
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: ro at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Host: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
Target: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
Build: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
While testing a fix for PR target/71080, I noticed a couple of additional
testsuite failures with -mcmodel=medium. It turns out that they are already
present
on the gcc-6 branch, i.e. without my patch that triggered the PR above:
FAIL: gcc.target/i386/387-12.c scan-assembler fld1
FAIL: gcc.target/i386/387-12.c scan-assembler fldz
FAIL: gcc.target/i386/avxfp-1.c scan-assembler vmaxsd
FAIL: gcc.target/i386/avxfp-1.c scan-assembler vminsd
FAIL: gcc.target/i386/avxfp-2.c scan-assembler vmaxsd
FAIL: gcc.target/i386/avxfp-2.c scan-assembler vminsd
FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr52146.c (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr52698.c (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr52857-1.c (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr52857-2.c (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr53698.c (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr54157.c (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr55049-1.c (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr55093.c (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr55116-1.c (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr55116-2.c (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr55597.c (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr66470.c (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.target/i386/ssefp-1.c scan-assembler maxsd
FAIL: gcc.target/i386/ssefp-1.c scan-assembler minsd
FAIL: gcc.target/i386/ssefp-2.c scan-assembler maxsd
FAIL: gcc.target/i386/ssefp-2.c scan-assembler minsd
FAIL: gcc.target/i386/stack-prot-kernel.c scan-assembler-not %fs
I haven't even started analysing what's wrong, just want to file the PR so
others aren't surprised.
Rainer