This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug target/63890] [4.9/5 regression] Compiling trivial program with -O -p leads to misaligned stack
- From: "mrs at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2016 08:31:42 +0000
- Subject: [Bug target/63890] [4.9/5 regression] Compiling trivial program with -O -p leads to misaligned stack
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
- References: <bug-63890-4 at http dot gcc dot gnu dot org/bugzilla/>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63890
--- Comment #31 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org <mrs at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Does anyone have handy logs for:
FAIL: g++.old-deja/g++.law/profile1.C -std=gnu++11 execution test
FAIL: g++.old-deja/g++.law/profile1.C -std=gnu++14 execution test
FAIL: g++.old-deja/g++.law/profile1.C -std=gnu++98 execution test
FAIL: gcc.dg/nest.c execution test
FAIL: gcc.dg/nested-func-4.c execution test
FAIL: gcc.dg/pr32450.c execution test
FAIL: gcc.target/i386/mcount_pic.c execution test
(all with -m32).
handy for -m32 before things broke originally? I'm wondering if these are
regressions from that time? If they were present, we can close this PR with
the bug fix. If not, I'd like to keep this open (unless someone wants to file
a new PR and link to think one for the details. If we don't know, let's keep
it open for now til someone can investigate.