This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug rtl-optimization/67145] [6 Regression] associativity from pseudo-reg ordering
- From: "law at redhat dot com" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2016 19:05:12 +0000
- Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/67145] [6 Regression] associativity from pseudo-reg ordering
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
- References: <bug-67145-4 at http dot gcc dot gnu dot org/bugzilla/>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67145
Jeffrey A. Law <law at redhat dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |law at redhat dot com,
| |rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #11 from Jeffrey A. Law <law at redhat dot com> ---
So does anyone agree with Segher's assessment here:
https://www.mail-archive.com/gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org/msg133974.html
Essentially that this is a minor regression and that the rs6000 backend changes
necessary to fix the regression are too risky for stage4?
In which case we should consider downgrading to P2.
Thoughts?