This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug target/69613] [6 Regression] wrong code with -O and simple 128bit arithmetics and vectors @ aarch64
- From: "wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2016 20:58:45 +0000
- Subject: [Bug target/69613] [6 Regression] wrong code with -O and simple 128bit arithmetics and vectors @ aarch64
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
- References: <bug-69613-4 at http dot gcc dot gnu dot org/bugzilla/>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69613
Bill Schmidt <wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED
CC| |dje.gcc at gmail dot com,
| |seurer at linux dot vnet.ibm.com,
| |wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|FIXED |---
--- Comment #8 from Bill Schmidt <wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The new test fails with an ICE on powerpc64le-linux.gnu.
FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/pr69613.c -O0 3 blank line(s) in output
FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/pr69613.c -O0 (internal compiler error)
FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/pr69613.c -O0 (test for excess errors)
etc. for various optimization levels, lto, and so on.
I'll dig up a little more data.