This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug c/69974] New: gcc ICE on invalid code on x86_64-linux-gnu in "create_tmp_from_val"
- From: "helloqirun at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2016 07:12:00 +0000
- Subject: [Bug c/69974] New: gcc ICE on invalid code on x86_64-linux-gnu in "create_tmp_from_val"
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69974
Bug ID: 69974
Summary: gcc ICE on invalid code on x86_64-linux-gnu in
"create_tmp_from_val"
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: helloqirun at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
The following invalid code causes an ICE when compiled with the current gcc
trunk on x86_64-linux-gnu in both 32-bit and 64-bit modes.
$ gcc-trunk -v
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=gcc-trunk
COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/home/absozero/trunk/root-gcc/libexec/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/6.0.0/lto-wrapper
Target: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
Configured with: ../gcc/configure --prefix=/home/absozero/trunk/root-gcc
--enable-languages=c,c++ --disable-werror --enable-multilib
Thread model: posix
gcc version 6.0.0 20160225 (experimental) [trunk revision 233714] (GCC)
$ gcc-trunk abc.c
abc.c:1:11: error: expected '=', ',', ';', 'asm' or '__attribute__' before ')'
token
char var1 );
^
abc.c: In function 'fn1':
abc.c:5:13: warning: implicit declaration of function 'var1'
[-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
var3 &= var1 ( &var2
^~~~
abc.c:5:5: error: expected ')' at end of input
var3 &= var1 ( &var2
^~~~
abc.c:5:5: error: expected declaration or statement at end of input
abc.c: At top level:
abc.c:2:11: error: storage size of 'var2' isn't known
struct S1 var2;
^~~~
abc.c: In function 'fn1':
abc.c:5:13: internal compiler error: tree check: expected class 'type', have
'exceptional' (error_mark) in create_tmp_from_val, at gimplify.c:497
var3 &= var1 ( &var2
0xddd3b7 tree_class_check_failed(tree_node const*, tree_code_class, char
const*, int, char const*)
../../gcc/gcc/tree.c:9688
0x8f61ef tree_class_check(tree_node*, tree_code_class, char const*, int, char
const*)
../../gcc/gcc/tree.h:3129
0x8f61ef create_tmp_from_val
../../gcc/gcc/gimplify.c:497
0x8f61ef lookup_tmp_var
../../gcc/gcc/gimplify.c:533
0x8f61ef internal_get_tmp_var
../../gcc/gcc/gimplify.c:563
0x8fc462 get_initialized_tmp_var(tree_node*, gimple**, gimple**)
../../gcc/gcc/gimplify.c:600
0x8fc462 gimplify_save_expr
../../gcc/gcc/gimplify.c:4979
0x8fc462 gimplify_expr(tree_node**, gimple**, gimple**, bool (*)(tree_node*),
int)
../../gcc/gcc/gimplify.c:10452
0x9015e6 gimplify_stmt(tree_node**, gimple**)
../../gcc/gcc/gimplify.c:5644
0x9021f1 gimplify_compound_expr
../../gcc/gcc/gimplify.c:4934
0x8fe64c gimplify_expr(tree_node**, gimple**, gimple**, bool (*)(tree_node*),
int)
../../gcc/gcc/gimplify.c:10153
0x9015e6 gimplify_stmt(tree_node**, gimple**)
../../gcc/gcc/gimplify.c:5644
0x902825 gimplify_bind_expr
../../gcc/gcc/gimplify.c:1142
0x8fc8b2 gimplify_expr(tree_node**, gimple**, gimple**, bool (*)(tree_node*),
int)
../../gcc/gcc/gimplify.c:10363
0x9015e6 gimplify_stmt(tree_node**, gimple**)
../../gcc/gcc/gimplify.c:5644
0x903444 gimplify_body(tree_node*, bool)
../../gcc/gcc/gimplify.c:11295
0x903ad6 gimplify_function_tree(tree_node*)
../../gcc/gcc/gimplify.c:11451
0x786e27 cgraph_node::analyze()
../../gcc/gcc/cgraphunit.c:625
0x78a193 analyze_functions
../../gcc/gcc/cgraphunit.c:1086
0x78aed8 symbol_table::finalize_compilation_unit()
../../gcc/gcc/cgraphunit.c:2540
Please submit a full bug report,
with preprocessed source if appropriate.
Please include the complete backtrace with any bug report.
See <http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html> for instructions.
$ cat abc.c
char var1 );
struct S1 var2;
int var3;
void fn1() {
var3 &= var1 ( &var2