This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug fortran/69368] [6 Regression] spec2006 test case 416.gamess fails with the g++ 6.0 compiler starting with r232508
- From: "rguenther at suse dot de" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2016 13:37:14 +0000
- Subject: [Bug fortran/69368] [6 Regression] spec2006 test case 416.gamess fails with the g++ 6.0 compiler starting with r232508
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
- References: <bug-69368-4 at http dot gcc dot gnu dot org/bugzilla/>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69368
--- Comment #48 from rguenther at suse dot de <rguenther at suse dot de> ---
On Thu, 18 Feb 2016, rguenther at suse dot de wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69368
>
> --- Comment #46 from rguenther at suse dot de <rguenther at suse dot de> ---
> On Thu, 18 Feb 2016, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
>
> > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69368
> >
> > --- Comment #45 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
> > Consider e.g. one source file
> > INTEGER FOO
> > COMMON /BLK/ K(64)
> > DO I=1,64
> > K(I)=1
> > END DO
> > IF (FOO(5,12).NE.51) CALL ABORT
> > END
> > and another one:
> > FUNCTION FOO(I, J)
> > COMMON /BLK/ K(1)
> > FOO = K(I) + K(J) + K(2*I) + K(2*J)
> > END FUNCTION
> > If the second source file is compiled with -O2, it will return "wrong" value,
> > as if all accesses to K were using the same index (because the only valid index
> > is 1). If you compile with -O2 -fno-tree-dominator-opts, then it "works".
>
> Which is odd since FRE already should optimize it that way.
Ok, it does not. Supposedly more complicated situations are needed to
trigger sth wrong in FRE.