This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug libfortran/68867] numeric formatting problem in the fortran library


https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68867

--- Comment #20 from Jerry DeLisle <jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Jerry DeLisle from comment #19)
> (In reply to Bill Seurer from comment #12)
> 
> > I checked with the revision previous to this patch and the revision for this
> > patch and the only differences were fmt_g0_7 succeeding and
> > default_format_denormal_2 failing.
> 
> Sorry about that Bill, I missed that in my testing, there are other tests
> already failing and I thought it was one of those.  All the patch did was
> decrease the width of the default format, in other words, the width chosen
> when none is specified by the user.  The patch changed nothing
> computationaly speaking.
> 
> I will take a look at this default_format_denormal_2 and see.  It should
> just be a minor adjustment of the test itself.  Let me know if you see any
> thing else.

OK, the failing of default_format_denormal_2 has nothing to do with this PR or
formatting for printing of floating point numbers.  It has to do with internal
representations.  I believe that Steve is correct and the test should be
XFailed for all PowerPC.  It is already { xfail powerpc*-apple-darwin* }

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]