This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug libfortran/68743] [6 Regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/aint_anint_1.f90 -O0 execution test
- From: "kargl at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Sun, 13 Dec 2015 16:16:31 +0000
- Subject: [Bug libfortran/68743] [6 Regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/aint_anint_1.f90 -O0 execution test
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
- References: <bug-68743-4 at http dot gcc dot gnu dot org/bugzilla/>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68743
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #14 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to John David Anglin from comment #13)
> Changing back to libfortran as c99_functions.c was compiled with -std=gnu11.
>
> I must say this "optimization" is going to cause a lot of teeth gnashing
> as it reduces the utility of the language and it isn't safe without warnings
> about reserved key words. Finally, it might not be an optimization.
What happens if you change -std=gnu11 to -std=c11?
It is not clear why you think that this is a libgfortran
issue. It look likes a target problem (as hpux apparently
does not have floorf) or a middle-end problem (as gfortran
is supplying hpux with floorf with perfectly fine C code).