This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug fortran/68486] [6 Regression] 187.facerec in SPEC CPU 2000 failed to build
- From: "sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 14:55:08 +0000
- Subject: [Bug fortran/68486] [6 Regression] 187.facerec in SPEC CPU 2000 failed to build
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
- References: <bug-68486-4 at http dot gcc dot gnu dot org/bugzilla/>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68486
--- Comment #17 from Steve Kargl <sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu> ---
On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 09:15:04AM +0000, jgreenhalgh at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> >
> > Of course. As I stated, it won't hurt anything.
> > FAILs in the testsuite are not a problem. The
> > issue with EXPR_FUNCTION and cshift is a problem.
>
> The hurt is for those of us investigating the new regressions... That was 10
> minutes of my time to investigate, multiply that by the number of people
> watching for FAILs on their favourite targets (particularly with trunk as it is
> at the end of stage 1) there is certainly enough hurt to go round.
>
> Please revert the broken testcase and leave it for when you fix pr68227.
>
It took you 10 minutes to type 68227 into bugzilla's search feature?
I intend to commit the fix today. Unfortunately, I have a real job
and fixing gfortran is a hobby. Unnecessary code churn in the
repo is well unnecessary.