This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug target/66785] internal compiler error in record_operand_use


https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66785

Bernd Schmidt <bernds at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |bernds at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #5 from Bernd Schmidt <bernds at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Ah, sorry Jim, I already had a patch. Ramana pointed out this bug but I didn't
expect anyone else to actually investigate it. The overflow case can only occur
in a failure case if the operand can't be renamed, so I've chosen to just
record that fact.
Someone might want to take a look at the aarch64 backend to see if it needs to
take the new "failed" bit into account.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]