This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug middle-end/67239] [6 Regression] FAIL: 23_containers/unordered_set/insert/hash_policy.cc execution test
- From: "hjl.tools at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Sun, 15 Nov 2015 11:31:29 +0000
- Subject: [Bug middle-end/67239] [6 Regression] FAIL: 23_containers/unordered_set/insert/hash_policy.cc execution test
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
- References: <bug-67239-4 at http dot gcc dot gnu dot org/bugzilla/>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67239
H.J. Lu <hjl.tools at gmail dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Depends on| |60336
--- Comment #18 from H.J. Lu <hjl.tools at gmail dot com> ---
I think it is wrong for C++ to pass empty argument on stack. It
should be handled the same way as C.
Referenced Bugs:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60336
[Bug 60336] empty struct value is passed differently in C and C++