This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug debug/67192] [6 Regression] Backward-goto in loop can get wrong line number


https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67192

--- Comment #21 from Andreas Arnez <arnez at linux dot vnet.ibm.com> ---
(In reply to Andreas Arnez from comment #20)
> Posted a patch that is not as ambitious as completely getting rid of
> input_location, but also doesn't require a new function like
> c_parser_peek_token_keep_input_location():
> 
>   https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-10/msg01132.html

After investigating this further I recognized that this patch doesn't cover all
cases where the backward-goto is wrongly located.  Thus I've created a version
that basically follows the suggestion from comment #13, to pass an explicit
location to c_finish_loop:

  https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-10/msg02393.html

I haven't checked whether there are still other cases where add_stmt needs to
use input_location as the default location for the given statement.  It should
probably be one goal to get rid of this default handling.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]